A Rough Guide to Spotting Bad Science

< Back to search results

This infographic looks at the different factors that can contribute towards ‘bad’ science.

  • Format Cartoons
  • Language/s English
  • Target Audience Self-directed learning
  • Duration 5-15 mins
  • Difficulty Introductory

Key Concepts addressed


This infographic looks at the different factors that can contribute towards ‘bad’ science – it was inspired by the research I carried out for the recent aluminium chlorohydrate graphic, where many articles linked the compound to causing breast cancer, referencing scientific research which drew questionable conclusions from their results.

The vast majority of people will get their science news from online news site articles, and rarely delve into the research that the article is based on. Personally, I think it’s therefore important that people are capable of spotting bad scientific methods, or realising when articles are being economical with the conclusions drawn from research, and that’s what this graphic aims to do. Note that this is not a comprehensive overview, nor is it implied that the presence of one of the points noted automatically means that the research should be disregarded. This is merely intended to provide a rough guide to things to be alert to when either reading science articles or evaluating research.


Leave a Reply


You may also like


Contemporary EBP workshop for clinicians

This workshop focuses on integrating Shared Decision Making (SDM) training and Evidence-Based Practice (EBP) training through providing video demonstration (to model the skills) followed by teaching how to interpret and communicate research evidence and decision aids.

Rated from votes
Please log in to rate items
IEBH logo